Healthcare Fraud Defense Attorney

Scott Armstrong defends individuals based on years of first-chair trial experience at the nation’s leader in healthcare fraud cases: DOJ’s Fraud Section. After leading cases at the Fraud Section involving over $600 million in fraudulent healthcare claims, Scott can quickly navigate and defend individuals in a range of healthcare cases, including complaints under the False Claims Act (“FCA”).

Scott focuses primarily on defending healthcare executives, owners, physicians, nurses, and other medical professionals in cases involving allegations of healthcare fraud, violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, false statements relating to a healthcare matter, and major fraud against the United States.  

Drawing on his background, Scott Armstrong offers strategic counsel and advocacy to guide individuals through a range of allegations of impropriety in the healthcare industry.

Scott provides healthcare defense in and around the major cities of the Fraud Section’s Healthcare Fraud Strike Forces: Miami, Florida (SDFL); New York, New York (EDNY); Detroit, Michigan (EDMI); Houston, Texas (SDTX); Chicago, Illinois (ND ILL); Los Angeles, California (CDCA); Nashville, Tennessee (MDTN); Boston, Massachusetts (D MASS); and Washington, D.C. (DDC).

First-Chair Experience for Healthcare Defense

Trial-Ready Defense

Scott defends individuals in criminal and civil healthcare cases. Whether an executive, physician, or medical professional, Scott vigorously defends the interests of his clients from the time of an allegation through trial. Scott does so by leveraging his trial experience in healthcare matters, deep understanding of healthcare rules and regulations, and skill with complex “claims data.”

Scott ensures that every aspect of a client’s defense is meticulously managed to guard against pitfalls that arise in complex healthcare cases.

Given his years at a Fraud Section, Scott defends individuals in healthcare cases around the country, including the major markets for DOJ’s Strike Forces:  Miami, Houston, New York, Los Angeles, Detroit, Chicago, Nashville, Virginia, and the District of Columbia.

Compliance Defense

In addition to defending healthcare fraud cases, Scott defends individuals facing allegations of fraud, waste, and abuse brought by regulators, medical boards, and insurance companies.

Scott’s deep experience in healthcare-fraud cases allows him to defend medical professionals in audits and investigations into overutilization, “up coding,” and lack of medical necessity. 

By diving into the data, the applicable rules, and patient files, Scott provides a meticulous defense to guide clients through various enforcement actions. His thorough approach ensures that his clients are protected at every step of a case.

Data-Driven Defense

Based on his years of experience building and prosecuting cases involving over $600 million in false and fraudulent healthcare claims, Scott has critical first-hand experience with the ins and outs of healthcare case. With the data “know how” and first-chair trial experience, Scott stands ready to defend individuals on all fronts against the intricacies of any healthcare matter.

Scott’s data-driven defense ensures that clients receive the highest level of advocacy in legal battles involving complex medical and billing issues.

Defense of Individuals in Controlled-Substances Cases

As the former Director of the Fraud Section’s Appalachian Regional Prescription Opioid (“ARPO”) Strike Force, Scott defends executives, physicians, and medical professionals in a range of charges involving violations of the Controlled Substances Act, including the diversion of opioids and other controlled substances.

Scott was at the forefront of controlled-substances cases at the Department of Justice. His cases as a federal prosecutor collectively involved the diversion of over 15 million opioid pills, including Oxycodone, Hydrocodone, and Fentanyl. For his groundbreaking work with data analytics and trial excellence in controlled-substances cases, Scott was awarded the Assistant Attorney General’s Award for Distinguished Service and the Assistant Attorney General’s Award for Exceptional Service.

Scott now brings his first-chair trial experience in controlled-substances cases to defend individuals around the country facing allegations of controlled-substances diversion.

Representative Experience in Complex Healthcare Matters and Healthcare Fraud Trials

  • Represented several cardiologists against a False Claims Act complaint alleging fraud for submitting false claims to Medicare for prescription drugs (radiopharmaceuticals) in connection with nuclear stress testing

  • Represented a physician in connection with a CareFirst investigation into allegedly billing for medically unnecessary medical services


  • At DOJ, served as lead trial counsel against a physician and two clinic owners, who were convicted after a week-long trial for a $26 million scheme involving Medicare claims for medical services that were medically unnecessary and induced by kickbacks.

  • At DOJ, served as lead trial counsel in the Fraud Section’s first-ever use of data analytics to investigate, prosecute, and convict after a two-week trial a physician and clinic owner for conspiring to dispense over 2 million opioid pills unlawfully.

  • At DOJ, served as lead trial counsel against a Director of Nursing of a health clinic, convicted after a week-long trial for a $20 million scheme involving Medicare claims for medical services that were medically unnecessary and induced by kickbacks.

  • At DOJ, served as co-lead trial counsel against a physician convicted following a week-long trial for unlawfully prescribing medical injections and other medical services in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute.

Find Coverage of Scott’s Notable Experience in Healthcare Matters

FAQs in Healthcare Fraud Investigations

  • Healthcare fraud involves knowingly and willfully submitting false claims or misrepresenting services to get payments from federal programs like Medicare or Medicaid. It’s a federal crime that can lead to prison, fines, and exclusion from government healthcare programs.

  • Healthcare fraud is investigated by multiple federal and state agencies. The most active federal agencies include:

    • The Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG)

    • The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

    • The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), including the Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney’s Offices

    • Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MFCUs)

    • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), which conducts audits and refers suspicious activity to law enforcement.

    • These agencies often collaborate through task forces and use data analytics to detect suspicious billing patterns.

    • If you are contacted by any of these agencies, you should consult a healthcare fraud defense attorney before responding.

  • Common Medicare fraud schemes include:

    • Phantom billing: Charging for services never provided

    • Upcoding: Billing for a more expensive service than was performed

    • Unbundling: Charging separately for services that should be billed as one

    • Billing for medically unnecessary services

    • Kickbacks for patient referrals:  These schemes often trigger investigations by the DOJ, HHS, or the Medicare Fraud Strike Force.

    Medical equipment fraud is a major focus of Medicare enforcement. It often involves:

    • Billing for durable medical equipment (DME) never delivered

    • Using stolen patient IDs to file false DME claims

    • Providing kickbacks to doctors for equipment prescriptions

    • Enrolling fake companies to submit fraudulent claims

  • Agencies like the FBI, HHS, and Medicaid Fraud Control Units investigate fraud through audits, subpoenas, and data analytics. These investigations review billing records, compliance practices, and communications to build a case. A skilled lawyer can help you respond strategically and avoid escalation.

  • Yes. A civil investigative demand is a federal notice that you're under investigation. It’s not a routine request.  It often signals the start of a healthcare fraud case. An experienced CID defense lawyer can help you respond carefully, protect your rights, and prevent criminal charges.

  • Yes, especially if they are repeated or appear intentional. Even honest billing errors can trigger fraud investigations if they’re widespread. If your practice is under audit or investigation, consult a healthcare fraud defense lawyer immediately.

  • The False Claims Act allows the federal government—or whistleblowers—to sue providers who knowingly submit false claims. Penalties include fines over $20,000 per claim and triple damages. If you’ve been named in a qui tam lawsuit, consult a False Claims Act defense attorney immediately.

  • The Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) is a federal law that makes it illegal to offer, pay, solicit, or receive anything of value in exchange for referrals for services covered by Medicare, Medicaid, or other federal healthcare programs. This includes cash, gifts, rent deals, or bonuses. Violations can lead to criminal prosecution, civil penalties, and exclusion from federal programs.

  • Examples of AKS violations include:

    • Paying physicians for patient referrals

    • Offering free medical equipment in exchange for exclusive contracts

    • Waiving co-pays to attract more patients

    • Providing financial incentives to marketers for bringing in federally insured patients

    • Even well-intentioned arrangements can trigger liability if they involve patient referrals for medical services involving federal programs.

  • The AKS (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b) is a federal law that makes it a felony for anyone to “knowingly and willfully” pay or receive any kickback, bribe, or rebate in exchange for referrals of services reimbursed by Medicare, Medicaid or other federal health programs. To convict someone under the AKS, the government must prove both the act (giving or receiving remuneration for referrals) and the required mens rea: that the defendant acted knowingly and willfully. In plain terms, the person must have intentionally engaged in the transaction and understood (or was reckless about) the fact that it was wrongful. This mens rea requirement ensures that only deliberate pay-for-referral schemes are punished under the statute.

  • The government builds healthcare fraud cases using a wide range of evidence, including:

    • Billing and claims data submitted to Medicare or Medicaid

    • Medical records and documentation of services provided

    • Emails, text messages, or internal communications suggesting intent or knowledge

    • Testimony from whistleblowers, former employees or co-conspirators who have pled guilty and are cooperating with the government for leniency at sentencing

    • Data analytics to identify abnormal billing patterns or statistical outliers

    • Subpoenaed documents and interview transcripts This evidence is often used to show a pattern of fraud or to prove intent.

  • Healthcare fraud charges can lead to suspension or revocation of a medical license, even before conviction. Licensing boards often act based on allegations alone, for example an indictment. A lawyer can help protect your professional license and advise you on how to respond during investigations.